Monday, March 26, 2012

Can I Buy My Ticket For Catching Fire Yet?

.
I find it hard to look back in time and remember that I once was of the opinion that Jennifer Lawrence was wrong for Katniss Everdeen, our heroine in The Hunger Games. If I were going to defend my tomfoolery now I'd say it was just after she'd glammed herself to high heights for Winter's Bone awards and the freshest vision I had of her was the super blond and ultra buxom version of her on the red carpets. This was not the Katniss I was looking for.

But now that I've seen the movie I kind of want to reach back through time and smack my stupid face good and hard. What was I thinking? Lawrence is terrific - she sells Katniss' steeliness and her vulnerability with equal aplomb. She sells everything - it's been awhile since I have read the books and the film reminded what a first-person experience the story is. This is Katniss' story, and I thought Gary Ross did a great job of getting us inside her head all the while not relying on narration at all, which would've been the easy (cluttered) way to get away with it. The camerawork gets a little bit wobbly for its own good at times but I thought as a way of plunking us down there with Katniss it worked more than it didn't.

Generally I thought Ross made a lot of really smart choices in turning Collins' book into a movie. We probably could have used more time with Katniss in District 12 at the start to set up just how despairing their lives are supposed to be, but I understand that it was already an hour before we even got to the Games, so keeping things moving was an issue. Lawrence sold me on the little notes where this echoed - the way she caressed the fabrics in her room in the Capitol managed to express both awe and disgust, or that half-starved look on her face in the flashback where Peeta tosses her the bread, for instance. I think it got across the notes it needed to, mostly. 

Josh Hutcherson was great - while he never looked like the Peeta I'd imagined as much as Lawrence came to look like Katniss, he was able to overcome that anyway and make Peeta, for me, even more interesting than he was in the book. I think he complicated Peeta's actions just as much as Lawrence did, so there were times where I was wondering just how much he was playing for the cameras too, which doesn't always get across in the books since they're entirely from Katniss' perspective.

Woody Harrelson gave good Haymitch but I really don't know what they were thinking with that distracting Owen Wilson look they gave him. But the weight that Haymitch feels sending off these kids to their deaths year in year out was there. As for Stanley Tucci... Stanley Tucci's teeth. Teeth! So much teeth.

I wasn't crazy about Lenny Kravtiz as Cinna - he kind of sucked all the air out of the room every time he showed up. It felt as if he showed up with two days to film all his scenes and everything stopped in its tracks for him. But he and Lawrence did have a believable, sweet rapport (I think she might be incapable of not having a natural rapport with anything though.) Elizabeth Banks was a wondrous preening vision of grotesquerie and made every single right choice for Effie - the "reaping" at the start was always going to be nightmarish, but Banks really dug into the awkwardness of it and made it entirely unique and disquieting.

Speaking of disquieting, Donald Sutherland y'all. His viper's smile is going to haunt my nightmares. I long to see him have more to do. That last shot gave me chills. And finally, never do I remember wanting to have Seneca-Crane-from-the-book's babies, but Wes Bentley has gone and changed all of that. Flame-tipped beard crests never found their way into my fetish-pile before, but here we are.



The violence was dealt with especially well, I thought - it felt brutal but it got across what happened without wallowing in gore, which just isn't necessary here. From what I remember Collins never got too detailed with it either. I love Battle Royale too y'all, but this isn't going to be Battle Royale. (An aside: God I'm so tired of the endless exhausting "I'm so smart for knowing other stories that told this sort of story!" catcalls, from The Running Man to The Most Dangerous Game and on and on. We get it. You're so clever, congratulations! But THG actually tells its own story. Move on.)

Anyway the death that really needed to work did, judging from the trembling lip and tear-streaked face I was trying to disguise from the people around me. Indeed I found that moment (I'm purposefully being vague just in case, but y'all know who I mean) with its spill over into revolution incredibly powerful, perhaps the most powerful in the film (it reminded me of the part is Ross' Pleasantville where the "coloreds" start getting attacked, actually) and knowing what it means for what's to come...

Mostly what struck me about having this first book retold to me was how small it seems after everything that comes about in the second and third books - how broad the world gets from here on out, I mean. Here in The Hunger Games it's all relatively straightforward and centered entirely on Katniss' experience... which is probably why the first book is the most successful, story-wise. And the film succeeds on that level - I felt there with this girl on fire. Indeed it succeeded well enough that once the end credits started I thought wouldn't it be wonderful if at the end of the credits the second film just started right then and there! Kind of as a surprise gift to us fans. So I am writing this from inside the theater still. And I will stay here until Catching Fire starts. I will live off of popcorn kernels and the kindness of strangers until then. Wish me luck! 
.

6 comments:

James T said...

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I really don't know what my problem is and I create dillemas from nowhere, but I have been trying to decide how I'm going to approach the Hunger Games phenomenon for some time now.
Right now (it could change any time) I think I'll read the first book and see where that will take me. I don't mind missing the movie on the big screen.
I'm sure people really wanted me to explain my life-threatening dillema.
(Plius, I have a feeling some animals (normal or otherwise) are killed in the story so I prefer to read it intead of watching it in a theater. It's this thing I have.)

Joe Reid said...

I'm glad you finally admitted how ridiculous and wrong you were about Jennifer Lawrence. Because it was really threatening to become A Problem.

RJ said...

Will you come join me as I wait for the scenes in Catching Fire of Jennifer Lawrence and Donald Sutherland playing mind games with eachother? Real excited for that.

Remind me: Did the movie invent the specific details of the end of Seneca Crane involving the berries in the bowl or was that in the book? Because I LOVED that. So cold.

bcarter3 said...

Great review!

Thanks too for your comment on the endless patronizing "Battle Royale" references. I loved BR. It's the only movie I remember that I played a second time immediately after my first viewing. But the differences between BR and HG vastly outweigh any similarities.

It's like saying "Deadwood" is just a ripoff of "Gunsmoke".

I'm vacationing in Krakow, Poland, so I haven't seen HG yet, but I'll be at the first available show when I get back to DC!

DuchessKitty said...

RJ, the bowl of nightlock berries was done for the movie. In the book, you never find out how Crane dies.

Speaking of, I became so enamored of Wes Bentley's protrayal of Seneca Crane, that last scene when he's locked in that room really affected me. I almost screamed "No!" out loud. I too wanted to have a million of topiarily bearded babies with him.

Hugh Man said...

loved everything but the muttations. That was a scene that could have been played up. Truly horrifying in the book.