


.







Total Film got the chance to talk to Guillermo Del Toro about the ongoing process of preparing his two-film adaptation of The Hobbit, and the most interesting bit to me - although the whole thing's worth reading - was this exchange on developing the bestiary of the book's universe (and it's totally long but I'm just plunking the whole thing down here because a) Total Film's site makes you load a thousand pages to get through the entire interview, and b) I wanna):Total Film: You love creating your creatures and obviously The Hobbit offers some great opportunities. There’s the dragon Smaug, the spiders of Mirkwood, the Wargs, Beorn the bear-man…
Del Toro: The way I phrased it to Weta, I said we would keep the DNA in the same gene pool as the Rings trilogy, but that we would generate a different type of character. For example, in the trilogy most of the creatures are brutish or inarticulate.
In The Hobbit, the creatures speak: Smaug has beautiful lines of dialogue; the Great Goblin has beautiful lines of dialogue; many creatures do. So we had to design them with a different approach because you are not just designing things that are scary.
I also wanted some of the monsters in The Hobbit to be majestic.
I wanted the Wargs to have a certain beauty so that you don't have a massively clear definition: what is beautiful is good and what is ugly is not. Some of the monsters are absolutely gorgeous.
TF: Smaug won’t be like the dragons in Reign Of Fire, say. Was it a big challenge to communicate his character?
Del Toro: I think one of the designs I’m the proudest of is Smaug. Obviously he took the longest.
It’s actually still active: we’re finishing his colour palette and a little bit of the texture. But the bulk of the design took about a year, solid. It’s because of the unique features of the dragon.
Early in production I came up with a very strong idea that would separate Smaug from every other dragon ever made. The problem was implementing that idea. But I think we’ve nailed it.
TF: What was the idea?
Del Toro: I cannot tell you what it was because it would be a massive spoiler! But I’m 100 per cent happy with Smaug. If there is such as thing as 110 per cent, then I’m there!
TF: What about the spiders? How faithful are they to Shelob from Return Of The King?
Del Toro: Well, they are the progeny of Shelob, but Shelob was quite a promiscuous girl [laughs]. She mated with many partners. And insects and spiders are incredibly adaptable creatures. There will be spiders… [Laughs]
That sounds like a Paul Thomas Anderson sequel: There Will Be Spiders! But they are visually quite striking and in a different way to Shelob.
I wish I could tell you more but I would be spoiling it again. They are very different. They are more creatures of the shadow, more creatures of the deep forest. They are not earth nesting. They are nesting in the canopies so physically they have adapted to that environment.
There's a pleasant little chat with the lovely Morena Baccarin, the one-time Firefly star who's now running things on ABC's new remake of V, over at io9 today that you oughta read if you've watched the first episode already (sidenote: I liked it.). She addresses the "Alien leader = Obama" subject that's been brought up, (she give a sort of no answer) as well as The Most Important Thing Of All:Baccarin admits she gets asked whether she'll be eating a live hamster — like, pretty much all the time. She says:
"We haven't done it in these [first] four episodes, and I'm bracing myself. And so many people ask about it, I think it's imminent. I think we are going to pay homage to those moments, but not maybe do them the same way — so hopefully I won't have to put a hamster down my throat."



It was late when I got home last night from the screening of The Box and the Q&A with Richard Kelly and James Marsden (or at least late for an old man like me) but I did notice before I went to sleep a certain tweet from the mind of Roger Ebert:
"It wasn't screened in a timely fashion for critics, but "The Box" is surprisingly good."
"Norma and Arthur Lewis aren't bad people -- pretty nice ones, in fact. They regret her impulsive action immediately. But then the plot grows sinister, coiling around to involve them, which we expect, but also venturing into completely unanticipated directions, and inspiring as many unanswered questions as "Knowing," which I loved.
Many readers hated "Knowing," and many will hate "The Box." What can I say? I'm not here to agree with you. This movie kept me involved and intrigued, and for that I'm grateful. I'm beginning to wonder whether, in some situations, absurdity might not be a strength."
That's actually the end of his review, so my apologies for ruining what he builds to. That being a defense of Knowing of all godforsaken things. Jinkies.
Okay, honesty time - I need to step back from that, I have not gotten around to watching Knowing yet. So I know nothing. I've had it for months but Alex Proyas is another filmmaker like Richard Kelly that has started to depress me (although Proyas is much, much further gone than Kelly is), and I just haven't wanted to go there just yet. Perhaps I oughta. Although if its anything on par with my reaction to The Box, I just have got more depression in store.
"Heading back to LA on opening day - thanks to everyone in NYC for your support!"

But both of those movies, besides eventual cult-status, were big honking flops. So he needed a winner here. So he got his Big-Deal Movie Star in the lead, he got the studio push (even if they did flick it through the release schedule ruthlessly for awhile there) with the commercials and the posters and the red carpet treatment. He promised a whittling down of his usual scatter-shot approach - he's going for a stream-lined story this time, he promised. Simple, to the point.
What I think it is is Richard Kelly appears to be a film-maker in crisis. Southland Tales - the critical drubbing, the dumped-into-no-theaters thing - it appears to have shaken him fairly deeply. You can read it in the interviews he does and it's all over the face of this movie. The Box lacks the conviction of any convictions at all. There are great ideas and moments here and there that weasel their way through the otherwise idle scenery, but nothing pops. Nothing connects. I love that Richard Kelly's got ideas just bursting out of him that he wants to throw at us, but here I just couldn't figure out what all the background noise was in service of. Scenes just happened. Things just happened. I didn't especially feel anything was connected - that anyone's actions were progressing in any kind of logical manner, even unto his own story. His own point of view. They went from point A to point M to point F to point B, all while emotionally flying from dull-eyed depression to dull-eyed confusion in a single stroke!
I do wonder if a re-edit could've helped. I know shaving a second here and a second there, constructing a rhythm to the madness, can make a huge difference. Here there was no rhythm. I'd get excited in fits and starts, realizing that the film had finally hooked me in a great scene or moment - and there are some really great creepy moments in the film - and then it would just drift off, lose me immediately. I never much felt an emotional connection with any of the characters. James Marsden is a supernaturally beautiful man (even more so in person - I stood right next to him after the screening and he freaked me the fuck out he is so pretty) so that helped, and he did what he could with the role. Frank Langella's part is far more thankless than you would expect it to be going in - he really doesn't have much to do beyond stand there disfigured behaving emotionally disconnected and tell them the rules of the game, which change every fifteen minutes.
As for Cameron... I know that I knock Diaz now and then, but that's more her public persona than her acting prowess - I think she's been quite good in several things,. But here... hmm... she really just doesn't seem to be connecting with anything at all. I don't really like to or feel good about singling her out here, and I think due credit for her failure's gotta be laid at Kelly's feet as well, but in almost every scene I found myself stepping back and thinking to myself that she was just not convincing me of anything that was going on around her. I actually remember my mind wandering at one point off to Mary McDonnell in Donnie Darko as Donnie's mother Rose and how freaking incredible she is in that small role and how much this film would benefit from that kind of presence.
--- Doctor Darko - I'm sure there will be tons of interviews and articles on Richard Kelly today since The Box is now open for business so I'll surely miss plenty. But here are a couple that grabbed my eye this morning. There's a good-sized chat with him over at AICN and a brief one at io9 that touches on some interesting stuff (including whether he's seen S. Darko or not), and also at io9 there's a run-through of what they're calling the "Darko Mythos," which supposedly runs through all three of his films so far. Worm-holes and what-not. Interesting stuff.
--- Bear With Faris - Oh God, Anna Faris, you are really testing my dedication right now. This dumb-kid trilogy of yours - first there was Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs, next up you're a voice in the Chipmunks "Squeakuel" (shudder at that word), and now you've signed on to presumably be the live-action portion of a partially animated Yogi Bear movie? Come on, lady! I demand that you use the cash you make from this to make a raunchy lady-comedy where you're not showing off your tits, please. Oh and Justin Timberlake is voicing Boo-Boo in this Yogi movie. Him, I expect this from.
--- Come To Me, My Son - Now this is the sort of great news I hunger for today: BD has word on Werner Herzog's other movie this year, the one that doesn't star Nicolas Cage and make my mind spin, the one called My Son My Son What Have Ye Done? that stars Michael Shannon, Willem Dafoe, Chloe Sevigny, Grace effin' Zabriskie, and a bunch more awesome people. It's opening here in NYC on December 11th! Whee! If I'd known this was getting a release this soon it would've made my Five Most Anticipated Movies list that I made yesterday; I'd been assuming we'd be waiting until next year for it. It's opening at IFC Center so I would hazard a guess that it might play on their VOD channel around that time too maybe. Unless they're doing this for an Oscar run - playing on VOD complicates that, doesn't it? Man the Oscars have got to catch up with the real world. That's also the poster there to the right, and BD has the trailer as well.
--- Freud V Jung - Slash has also got word on another possibility for David Cronenberg's next movie - here's how they sell the source material:
"Talking Cure, a 2002 play by Christopher Hampton. (Ralph Fiennes, Cronenberg’s star in Spider, appeared in one of the primary productions of the play.) The story’s arc concerns the founding fathers of psychoanalysis, Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud, and their parallel relationships with a beautiful patient, Sabina Spielrein."
--- I'll See That - Doesn't this description (via) sound like the sorta movie you might enjoy:
"...the film focuses on "a high school tramp who runs away with the school's gay, fat kid in his homophobic dad's stolen car."
--- And finally, Joe has seen the Hannah Montana movie two times. Two times! Hours of his life have been spent therein. So you owe him a glance at the hysterical fruit of that monumental effort. Plus, gay twink handling cock!









"A hyper-stylized TWIN PEAKS for the Coachella Generation, featuring a gorgeous, super hot young cast, KABOOM is a wild and sex-drenched horror-comedy thriller that tells the story of Smith, an ambisexual 18-year-old college freshman who stumbles upon a monstrous conspiracy in a seemingly idyllic Southern California seaside town...
Smith's everyday life in the dorms - hanging out with his arty, sarcastic best friend Stella, hooking up with a beautiful free spirit named London, lusting for his gorgeous but dim surfer roommate Thor - all gets turned upside-down after one fateful, terrifying night. Tripping on some hallucinogenic cookies he ate at a party, Smith is convinced he's witnessed the gruesome murder of an enigmatic Red Haired Girl who has been haunting his dreams."
Enigmatic red-haired girl? Uh... what is this, Charlie Brown?
Whilst just now reading through this article on Peter Jackson and The Lovely Bones it struck me that there's not a whole lot left to the year, is there? I mean that both in terms of days - 57 to go til 2010! - and in terms of films being released in those 57 days. Still, all the heavy-hitting award-magnets have plunked themselves down in the span per usual, so surely there's gotta be something worth seeing, right?






“The whole premise was such a joke,” he says now, “and I think maybe I took it too seriously. I started to feel like I was becoming a cliché of myself.”
"“In all honesty, [The BQE] is what really sabotaged my creative momentum. It wasn’t Illinois so much,” he says. “I suffered sort of an existential creative crisis after that piece. I no longer knew what a song was and how to write an album. It overextended me in a way that I couldn’t find my way back to the song.”
“I’m wondering, why do people make albums anymore when we just download? Why are songs like three or four minutes, and why are records 40 minutes long? They’re based on the record, vinyl, the CD, and these forms are antiquated now. So can’t an album be eternity, or can’t it be five minutes?” He pauses. “I no longer really have faith in the album anymore. I no longer have faith in the song.”
"And then it hits you: If skyscrapers are the ultimate phallic symbols, then the urban expressway is the ultimate birth canal, the uterine wall, the anatomical passageway, the ultimate means of egress, and the process by which we are all born again. The BQE is the Motherhood of Civilization, the Breast of Being, the fallopian tube, the biological canal from which all of life emerges in resplendent beauty, newborn and newly fashioned with the immaculate countenance of a baby."

















Surprisingly absorbing, especially when you read between the lines of the access you're actually being given. But honestly for just this moment I'd heard enough of the freak-show that was MJ's life and for a change it was interesting to simply observe the man at work. Because of the limited amount of coverage director Kenny Ortega got from the rehearsals the shots are longer and therefore more telling; if this had been the actual concert you couldn't have paid me to sit through it, but watching the show being formed in starts and sputters allows an actual curiosity to invade the proceedings.
"Michael Fassbender ("Inglourious Basterds," "Hunger") has joined the cast of "A Single Shot" for Hanway Films says Screen Daily.
Fassbender will portray a poacher who is on the lam from a group of brutal killers after he discovers a case of blood money. Forest Whitaker, William H. Macy and Thomas Haden Church also star.
Matthew F Jones adapted the screenplay from his novel of the same name while Chris Coen and Brad Arseneau are producing. David Jacobson ("Down in the Valley," "Dahmer") directs the feature which begins shooting in Ontario in January."





































































I could've sworn that I'd posted about this film before but I can't seem to find the post. Huh. Anyway When Time Ran Out... was a favorite of mine when I was a kid and I just finally got a copy of it recently so it's long overdue that I give the flick some love.




--- Cast Me In - Filming has begun on the Let the Right One In remake, called Let Me In, and some new faces were added to the cast including the much-liked-by-me Elias Koteas. I am so on the fence with this film; every time I think I'm gonna be angry about it they hire somebody like Koteas or Richard Jenkins that I really like and I begin to wonder if it's possible to construct something under the umbrella of American film-making that might as least have some of the beauty and horror of the original... I wonder. I doubt, doubt muchly, but I wonder.
--- Bah Humbug Bunny - Why the hell is Robert Zemeckis so invested in his dead-eyed animated monsters? Now he's gonna make a second Roger Rabbit movie and cram in performance-captured characters that will scare the living bejesus out of Roger and pals. Why, Robert? Why?
--- Roar Them Candles Down - Yesterday was Gojira's 55th birthday. Happy stomp stomp!"In Viacom's earnings call Tuesday morning, CEO Philippe Dauman said the movie has been one of those surprise hits that comes along only rarely.
Given that a follow-up release wouldn't have the same element of surprise as "Paranormal," it will be key to craft a smart approach to a sequel, he said. "Our team will come up with the right creative and marketing approach," he told analysts. "
--- Third Witch - Also a repercussion of Activity's success? And a happy one at that? There might be a third Blair Witch film after all. Says Eduardo Sanchez, co-director of Blair Witch, also via AICN:"They'd pick up from where the original left off, pretending Blair Witch 2 never happened. The duo recently went on a drive through their original Blair Witch haunts, about a half hour from Sánchez's Maryland home, looking for inspiration.
They've worked up a treatment for a new story, which would involve original cast members Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard and Michael C. Williams, albeit in smaller roles.
"We're at the step where we're about to pitch to Lionsgate, which owns the movie rights now. It's pretty much up to them. They can completely squash it or greenlight it.""
--- Penny ♥s Pedro - Thanks to A Blog Next Door for reminding me about this interview with Penelope Cruz and Pedro Almodovar at the NYT (and pointing out the exact same quote that made me like Penny even more); anyway I read it before I left and really enjoyed it.""The fourth one is an ensemble. It'll take place right now, 10 years later, and it's going to take place in [Sidney Prescott's hometown of] Woodsboro. We'll have our three main characters, and we'll be introducing several more" says Williamson.
He adds that those 'several more' will essentially be the stars of this new trilogy - "We'll also be introducing a little group, a little ensemble of new castmembers. That'll take us through the next three.""
--- Dolphy Dick - How can I resist this post at The Film Experience where Nat proves he's got himself an encyclopedic knowledge of Dolph Lungren's nudity? I cannot. I can only bow down in awe. And add this Showdown in Little Tokyo movie immediately to my queue, wherein Brandon Lee apparently sees Mr. Lundgren naked and tells him he's got "the biggest dick I've ever seen on a man." That's joy. (Relatedly, have y'all seen the recent naked pic (NSFW!) of the big D? That's what Brandon was talking about! Anyway Dolph is 52! And looking good.) Here's a previous gratuitous post for him. Rocky IV was vital to my development.
--- Tannis, Kim - I think that Sunset Gun writer Kim Morgan is trying to woo me - she dressed as Rosemary Woodhouse for Halloween this year. And posted a bunch of pictures of herself. At the party at the Playboy Mansion. Egads.
.


I mentioned this in passing a couple of weeks back but I am off as of this afternoon for a long weekend of gory and ghoulish activities and won't be around to post again until Tuesday. So I hope everyone has the merriest of unholy holidays this weekend!
--- Re Xenomorph - In a chat with Empire, Ridley Scott speaks up a lil' bit on the Alien prequel he is now working on. Choice bit:
“It’s a brand new box of tricks,” said Sir Ridley. “We know what the road map is, and the screenplay is now being put on paper. The prequel will be a while ago. It’s very difficult to put a year on Alien, but [for example] if Alien was towards the end of this century, then the prequel story will take place thirty years prior.”
--- And then there's this fun news via Slash:"Grindhouse Releasing is bringing Sam Raimi’s original horror classic THE EVIL DEAD back to the big screen as a midnight movie.
Raimi and producers Robert Tapert and Bruce Campbell gave the go-ahead for a series of EVIL DEAD revival screenings to Grindhouse Releasing partner Bob Murawski, the film editor of Raimi’s SPIDER MAN 1, 2 & 3, DRAG ME TO HELL and the EVIL DEAD sequel ARMY OF DARKNESS.
Stephen King hailed THE EVIL DEAD as “the most ferociously original film of the year”? when the film premiered in 1981. Shot in Michigan and Tennessee, Raimi’s low-budget debut was released independently with a self-imposed ‘No One Under 17′ rating for its graphic violence and gore.
... “Nothing can prepare an audience for what they are about to see, because nothing punishes an audience like EVIL DEAD - especially on the big screen,” says Bruce Campbell. “I’m really glad it’s back. People are gonna be hurt.”
Formed by actor/director Sage Stallone and Murawski, Grindhouse Releasing restores and distributes classic horror and exploitation films. The company teamed with Quentin Tarantino in the ’90s to revive Lucio Fulci’s Italian horror classic THE BEYOND.
A similar theatrical break is planned for THE EVIL DEAD, with midnight screenings in select theaters across the U.S. and Canada."









